New Mexico Meta Ruling Marks Step Towards Safer Social Media for Children

Amnesty International· August 8, 2026

A New Mexico judge has ordered Meta to pay $567 million to address mental health harms caused to children by its social media platforms. The ruling also mandates significant design changes to Instagram and Facebook, such as removing like counts for minors and restricting overnight notifications. This decision highlights increasing legal pressure on social media companies to prioritize child safety over engagement-driven design choices.

Judge Bryan Biedscheid of New Mexico issued a ruling requiring Meta to pay $567 million in damages related to the impact of its platforms on children’s mental health. Beyond the financial penalty, the court mandated specific structural changes to Facebook and Instagram to enhance safety for young users. These changes include the removal of "like" counts for users under the age of 18 and the restriction of notifications during overnight hours, targeting features that critics argue are designed to maximize engagement at the cost of wellbeing.

This latest fine follows a previous $375 million penalty Meta was ordered to pay in March within the same case. In that instance, a jury determined that the company had misled users regarding platform safety and had facilitated the sexual exploitation of young people. The combined legal actions reflect a growing trend of holding tech giants accountable for their design choices, as seen in a separate Los Angeles case where Meta and Google were ordered to pay $6 million for a young woman’s social media addiction.

Amnesty International has praised the ruling, stating that it validates long-standing warnings that social media platforms are engineered for profit rather than the protection of children's rights. The organization emphasized that child safety must be integrated into platform design from the outset rather than treated as an afterthought. Meta has expressed disagreement with the court's decision and has announced its intention to appeal the ruling.

Read the full story at Amnesty International

Summary generated by RabbitReport AI from public reporting. The full article and original reporting belong to Amnesty International.